Saturday, April 11, 2009

The bigger game - 1

These are weird times. The world is in a state of war. There are no clearly defined enemies, there's no hero, no one knows when and how will this war end.

There are two ways this war can be observed. One, through the governments' eyes as shown by popular media. This perspective is as simple as ABC: 'Taliban and Al-Qaeda attacked America on 9/11 and now America wants to take revenge and wipe them out. Taliban have been hiding and running and America and its allies has been chasing them since the war started.' Cat and mouse game (We have got a very clever mouse by the way and the cat through this perspective falls nothing short of Tom). This is the easy way out. This is all what the governments tell us and want us to believe.

The second perspective is that its the cat who is cunning and the mouse is the poor guy. Reaching this conclusion is difficult because it requires inquisitiveness, deep insight and a lot of common sense. The information is difficult to get because it doesn't get that highlighted by the media and is ignored as unimportant. It is found in bits and pieces and the puzzle has to be solved by joining the information. The outcome is usually really huge and scary. Unfortunately the so called liberals and moderates who are vigorously skeptic about traditions, orthodoxy and religion miserably fail to read between the lines when it comes to politics. They don't question, they don't ponder. They want to believe the 'cunning mouse-naive cat' theory.

9/11 drama was staged by American government/agencies. Now there is a huge bundle of evidence supporting it. I have seen at least three American documentaries proving that 9/11 was not the job of Al-Qaeda. Evidence from other countries and other Americans is additive. Every one who believes that it was done by Al-Qaeda needs to go through the evidence against it. Common sense also raises many questions to create doubt against the government presented perspective. Like: How come the CIA never knew it? How come the air traffic controlling departments couldn't notice the change in a plane's route? Why weren't the defense mechanisms mobilized until the second plane crash which took place after about 10 minutes of the first? Etc. This was done to terrorize people, so that they would give up their rights, give in to the government and the government could justify her invasion of South Asia. There was NO other way at all she could do it. So the whole war on terror becomes a lie. Now, why would she do it, I haven't been able to find one answer. Oil reserves of Iraq, deeming Pakistan and China as potential threats and reaching up to them, fear of spreading of Islam. (Speaking of Islam, 20,000 people convert to Islam in America each year according to NBC News)

(To be continued)

No comments: